188: Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity

About this episode

Dan and James discuss a recent editorial which argues that double-blind peer review is detrimental to scientific integrity. Links • The editorial from Christopher Mebane: https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgae046 Other links Everything Hertz on Bluesky • Dan on Bluesky • James on Bluesky • Everything Hertz on Bluesky Support us on Patreon and get bonus stuff! • $1 per month: A 20% discount on Everything Hertz merchandise, access to the occasional bonus episode, and the the warm feeling you're supporting the show • $5 per month or more: All the stuff you get in the one dollar tier PLUS a bonus episode every month Citation Quintana, D. S., & Heathers, J. (2025, Jan 30). Double-blind peer review vs. scientific integrity, Everything Hertz [Audio podcast], DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/6XS29