ParasocialDownload on theApp Store

Divided Argument

Norway-Sweden Worshippers

1 hr 30 min

3 min preview

Listen to the full episode

Do not have it yet? Parasocial is a podcast player by Super Simple.

About this episode

We picked two immigration decisions from the same day over the transgender-sports case because — Dan’s protests notwithstanding — that’s where the interesting law is. In Mullin v. Doe the Court lets the administration terminate temporary protected status for Haiti and Syria, holding the statute’s no-judicial-review bar swallows the procedural challenges and that the equal-protection claim fails on the merits — with a genuinely odd move: skipping the jurisdictional question the way Steel Co. says you can’t. In Mullin v. Al Otro Lado a fight about asylum-metering collapses onto a single preposition — whether a migrant stopped at the border “arrives in” the United States — and the majority says no. Along the way: brown M&Ms and Van Halen riders, whether Congress can strip review of constitutional claims without turning in a circle and sprinkling salt on the ground, Bolling v. Sharpe as a candidate for the worst decision ever, and why there’s no White Somalia to run a controlled experiment. Highlights• [00:00:28] Opening: hype music, and listening to your own podcast to get in the mood • [00:01:42] Building a live-show rider with Claude Code, and the Van Halen brown-M&Ms test as a s

Norway-Sweden Worshippers — Divided Argument