ParasocialDownload on theApp Store

Aftershock: The War on Terror

From the Archive: ‘The War on Terrorism: Is There an Alternative?’

1 hr 7 min

3 min preview

Listen to the full episode

Do not have it yet? Parasocial is a podcast player by Super Simple.

About this episode

In May 2002, six months after the invasion of Afghanistan but before the Iraq war, the London Review of Books held a debate: ‘The War on Terrorism: Is There an Alternative?’ The panel comprised Tariq Ali, Christopher Hitchens, Jacqueline Rose, Anatol Lieven and Onora O’Neill. President Bush’s ultimatum set the tone: either you’re with us or you’re with the terrorists. The Guardian described it as ‘a battle for the soul of the left’. Hitchens argued for military action and said that ‘theocratic fascists must be crushed.’ Others on the panel questioned the premise of the War on Terror and where such a doctrine might lead. More from the LRB: The Belgrano Diary: ⁠⁠https://lrb.me/belgranowotpod⁠⁠  Subscribe to the LRB: ⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠⁠https://lrb.me/subswotpod⁠⁠  Close Readings podcast: ⁠⁠⁠https://lrb.me/crwotpod⁠⁠  LRB Audiobooks: ⁠⁠⁠https://lrb.me/audiobookswotpod⁠⁠  Bags, binders and more at the LRB Store: ⁠⁠⁠https://lrb.me/storewotpod⁠⁠ Get in touch: podcasts@lrb.co.uk

From the Archive: ‘The War on Terrorism: Is There an Alternative?’ — Aftershock: The War on Terror